The Calcutta High Court will hear petitions challenging the Great Nicobar Project in June, rejecting the central government’s objections to the proceedings. The core issue revolves around environmental clearances granted for the project, a large-scale infrastructure development on Great Nicobar Island in the Andaman and Nicobar Islands.
Petitioners argue the project violates environmental regulations, particularly concerning its impact on the island’s fragile ecosystem, including its rainforests and the critically endangered Nicobar megapode. Concerns center on the extensive deforestation required – initially projected to impact over 96% of the island’s rainforest – and the potential disruption to the habitat of indigenous communities.
The central government contended the High Court lacked jurisdiction as the project site is outside West Bengal. However, the court dismissed this argument, stating petitioners residing in West Bengal are demonstrably affected by the project’s environmental consequences, establishing sufficient cause for jurisdiction. The court highlighted the interconnectedness of environmental issues and the potential for impacts extending beyond geographical boundaries.
The project aims to develop a transshipment port, a greenfield international airport, a power plant, and a township. The government asserts it’s crucial for India’s strategic and economic interests, enhancing connectivity and trade. However, critics claim the scale of the project is disproportionate and environmentally damaging, with alternative, less destructive options available.
The court directed the central government to file its response within four weeks. The petitioners include environmental activists and concerned citizens who seek a comprehensive environmental impact assessment and a reconsideration of the project’s scope and design to minimize ecological damage. The hearing in June will likely focus on the validity of the environmental clearances granted and the project’s adherence to environmental laws and regulations. The court’s decision could significantly impact the future of the Great Nicobar Project and set a precedent for environmental litigation involving projects with transboundary implications.
